All the Flowers: Marriage, #MeToo, Misogyny & Mythology

Libido over credo. Life lessons from literature’s Chess of Love.

Developing my own writing career in a webscape replete with #MeToo and, putting it mildly, misguided world leaders; a webscape with whole countries ‘divorcing’ one another with their own portmanteaus bandied about, whilst contrasting this against an exciting time in which world societies have radically reconsidered what love can look like between two people – not to mention having got married myself very recently – has me thinking about ideal behaviour between the sexes. It’s a theme which crops up a few times in my upcoming novel No Mór the Glen. If an ideal exists, what should it look like? After all, today’s literature still uses gynocentric models in which women get fridged all the time for the purpose of male-dominated narratives.

The first kind of Western ideal of love was courtly love. It propounded individualism, the chance to woo and be wooed, over the authority of ‘loving’ (read ‘marrying’) out of duty to the church, state, or to family. Individualised love was, essentially, seen as heresy or even worse. Tristan, after all, paid for forbidden love with his life

To read more access my Patreon content from just $1/month.

 

© Image, Hillman School.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s